Hi,
I used Netscape 6.2 and the Hebrew and Arabic look ok to me.
Can you tell me what you believe to be wrong? Maybe send me a screenshot
and identify the problem areas?
tex
juuichiketajin@ranmamail.com wrote:
>
> In Netscape 6, the demo apparently does not support
> appropriate directionality for Hebrew and Arabic
> characters.
> Please check this out.
>
> Also, when will we have a stylesheet code for
> tategaki? They should not use "ideographic" in the
> name for tategaki, as tategaki is used often without
> ideographs (it is used for the numbers on American
> mileposts, for one). Tategaki is also used for kana
> calligraphy, not one "ideograph" in there!
>
> There should be a "tategaki-ltr" and a "tategaki-rtl",
> depending on which line of characters is read first.
> Which way is Mongolian?
>
> > I have updated:
> > http://www.geocities.com/i18nguy/unicode-example.html
> >
> > Persian and Yiddish have been added and Armenian has
> changed.
> >
>
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> Get your free email from http://www.ranmamail.com
>
> Powered by Outblaze
-- ------------------------------------------------------------- Tex Texin Director, International Business mailto:Texin@Progress.com Tel: +1-781-280-4271 the Progress Company Fax: +1-781-280-4655 ------------------------------------------------------------- For a compelling demonstration for Unicode: http://www.geocities.com/i18nguy/unicode-example.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 23:54:22 EST