RE: MS Arial Unicode vs. MS Gothic (CJK)

• Previous message: Patrick Andries: "Re: Unicode Devanagari Range"
• Maybe in reply to: SOS Uni Bonn: "MS Arial Unicode vs. MS Gothic (CJK)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Sorry about that. I'll try again with an ordinary attachment...

- rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Cameron [mailto:Rick.Cameron@crystaldecisions.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2002 15:16
To: Unicode List
Subject: RE: MS Arial Unicode vs. MS Gothic (CJK)

When I insert these characters into Word 2002 and set the font to Arial
Unicode MS, I see <<...OLE_Obj...>> - two different glyphs.
- rick cameron
-----Original Message-----
From: SOS Uni Bonn [mailto:uso000@uni-bonn.de]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2002 13:33
To: Unicode List
Subject: MS Arial Unicode vs. MS Gothic (CJK)

I could not find sufficient information on unicode.org webpages, so please
let me ask - just send me a link for further information
Why do both of the characters coded 7130 and 7114 (焰 & 焔)
(and probably others, too) appear in the shape of 7130
when using MS Arial Unicode in MS Office
but in the proper shape with non Unicode Fonts like MS Gothic?
Kay Genenz

• Previous message: Patrick Andries: "Re: Unicode Devanagari Range"
• Maybe in reply to: SOS Uni Bonn: "MS Arial Unicode vs. MS Gothic (CJK)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jan 16 2002 - 18:25:30 EST