Re: Unicode 3.2 Beta Period Finishing

From: David Hopwood (david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk)
Date: Wed Jan 23 2002 - 00:23:08 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Rick McGowan wrote:
> You must be talking about the small number of glyphs that don't exist in
> the Mathematical Variants table.

Yes.

> There are several known missing glyphs that should have been noted in the
> cover file for the entire release. The known non-existing glyphs are in
> column two: 2229, 222A, 2278, 2279, 2293, 2294; and in column one: 2A3C
> through 2ACC, eight glyphs all together. The column-two glyphs never
> existed in the original proposal; and the column 1 glyphs are missing from
> the set of reference glyphs for Unicode 3.2.

We can *guess* what the column two glyphs look like from the descriptions,
I suppose, but isn't it kind of important to have images of them?

- --
David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>

Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/
RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5 0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01
Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a
public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been
seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBPE45fDkCAxeYt5gVAQG1VQgAlxpiB+nE7RH0nGwILkV15kt/pX8VwIYA
WDdJbfjKSERTV9vPIsVfFLLJQVx4nZlZgno0xfx29iQhrdV1dQ57R6jYjOCXsJ32
AKaz5nRF8QU98i1socEc2eG1SR53KpFQkNn3phd76yJ4mam7EqEwEPQihkh7SCQX
cgLrSt2eVqI0NPN/ossCQTa6j9aQHjy/k0SIbOjNH+7aW9B+23UlCv8fYcu2LvC4
vBbteyp3tZbgPN9DqMCMr+GMbgOSIbzWuF336SRGiIGlaM1J1259iFysmyY+EjSS
+mLT0H1HhIUFD/u0tSIXjJgE01vQPFCdTcxVbM8IaXFqevQVz4zKDQ==
=edaO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Jan 24 2002 - 01:18:29 EST