Re: [OT] Rich man Bill (RE: Issues with Unicode Hindi)

From: John Hudson (tiro@tiro.com)
Date: Thu Jan 24 2002 - 14:08:06 EST


At 10:44 1/24/2002, Marco Cimarosti wrote:

>I have been told that this mailing list is not for politics, so let's stick
>to bare logics:
>
>1. "we rob the poor man because he is poor"
>2. "we rob the poor man because he is rich"
>3. "we rob the rich man because he is poor"
>4. "we rob the rich man because he is rich"
>
>Do you agree that 2 and 3 are self-contradictory? So the choice is between 1
>and 4...

5. "we try not knowingly to rob anyone"

JH

Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC tiro@tiro.com

... es ist ein unwiederbringliches Bild der Vergangenheit,
das mit jeder Gegenwart zu verschwinden droht, die sich
nicht in ihm gemeint erkannte.

... every image of the past that is not recognized by the
present as one of its own concerns threatens to disappear
irretrievably.
                                               Walter Benjamin



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Jan 24 2002 - 13:39:09 EST