Mark Davis <email@example.com> wrote:
> Perhaps what is meant by the original request would be satisfied by
> the property:
> defined in
> These are essentially characters that have no visible glyphs and no
> advance width, but may have a different effect on the rendering of
> the text in which they are found (depending on context).
Perhaps. Or perhaps not. Only Gyula can say for sure what his
definition of "printable" might be, and this would be true for anybody
making a similar request.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Apr 24 2002 - 00:56:57 EDT