Re: Unicode vs Code pages

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Wed May 29 2002 - 15:02:42 EDT


And if you notice, support for non-Unicode APIs and code pages is somewhat
lame on Win CE for these very reasons?

As a rule, I like to kep answers simple and not add complexities that are
not there. :-)

MichKa

Michael Kaplan
Trigeminal Software, Inc. -- http://www.trigeminal.com/

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Cowan" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
To: ""Michael (michka) Kaplan"" <michka@trigeminal.com>
Cc: "Chris Kavanagh" <kavanagc@symbol.com>; <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: Unicode vs Code pages

> "Michael \(michka\) Kaplan" scripsit:
>
> > 1) Many applications do not yet support Unicode, and those applications
> > still need to work properly (imagine trying to sell an OS where your
> > favorite apps would not install and run?).
>
> But this does not apply to Windows CE, surely, where apps must be
> at least recompiled if not rewritten altogether?
>
> --
> John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> http://www.reutershealth.com
> I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
> han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed May 29 2002 - 13:10:44 EDT