Stefan Persson wrote:
> From: "Marco Cimarosti" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Or 127 ASCII code points?
> > Or ca. 9000 JIS code points?
> They are already encoded, aren't they?
No, they aren't. Unicode encodes the same characters encoded by ASCII (at
the same code points) and the same characters encoded by JIS (at different
code points), but it does NOT(*) include the ASCII or JIS code points
themselves. That would be like assigning a code to represent a code which
represents a character.
(*: Actually, 33 ASCII code points are encoded in range U+2400..U+2422, to
allow visible symbols for ASCII control codes).
Encoding the navy's flag alphabet or the Morse code would be exactly doing
this: assigning a code to a code which represents a letter.
But such a thing actually has a precedent: the Braille block. But this had a
(faint!) justification: those Braille patterns are not used to "encode
Braille in Unicode", but rather to encode commands to be sent to Braille
printers ("embossers", actually).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Jun 27 2002 - 06:16:26 EDT