On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 03:54:00PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 03:43:30PM +0200, Keld J?rn Simonsen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:03:05AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> > >
> > > > What people usually use is ISO 6429, this is eg what is used in
> > > > IETF charset definitions for the iso-8859 series.
> > >
> > > 6249 isn't the character-set definition - it's the control-sequences.
> > > 8859 corresponds to character-set definitions.
> > >
> > > (I assume that's what you meant to say, but did not).
> > 6429 defines both control sequences and control characters.
> only incidentally - the focus of the document (the other 98% by page count)
> is devoted to control sequences.
Agreeg, but we are looking for the source for control characters, and
then 6429 is the one altho it is not the meat of that standard.
> my point: a more accurate answer to his question would have been to point out
Which only specifies very few control characters?
Nah, 6429 is the answer, if these codes are used at all, and
10646 also refers 6429.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Jun 27 2002 - 15:12:56 EDT