Kenneth Whistler wrote,
> > Another problem with TR28 is that its date is earlier than the date
> > on TR27. This suggests that TR27 is more current.
> I don't understand this claim.
After misreading the dates and writing the letter last Monday,
the internet connection was lost here for four days!
I stand corrected (or, at least, better informed) on several items
and am thankful to those who contributed to this thread.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Jul 06 2002 - 03:48:06 EDT