Re: Phaistos in ConScript

From: Doug Ewell (
Date: Mon Jul 08 2002 - 23:17:42 EDT

Michael Everson <everson at evertype dot com> wrote:

> Say that we found another Phaistos document with the same string in
> it, and were able to decipher Phaistos, and found that the string
> matched in meaning and syntax to what's on the disk. Then we would
> have a superfluous character encoded.

You mean like U+0340 and U+0341?

(ducking and running)

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Jul 08 2002 - 21:39:22 EDT