Re: ISO/IEC 10646 versus Unicode

From: David Starner (
Date: Fri Jul 19 2002 - 18:49:55 EDT

At 10:41 AM 7/19/02 -0400, Alain LaBonté wrote:
> That said, the Unicode approach was superior -- because simpler --
> than the first UCS drafts which went as far as DIS before being turned down.

Is there a copy or a summary of this online? I've found details or
exact texts for most of the other early Unicodia online, but never this.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 19 2002 - 14:56:21 EDT