Re: is GB18030 a combination of CJK and CJK extension?

From: Doug Ewell (
Date: Sat Jul 20 2002 - 18:16:37 EDT

Eric Muller wrote:

> GB 18030 can be three different things, depending on how you
> interpret it:
> 3. it is roughly a UTF, the most notable deviations being that it can
> represent a bit more than 0x0 - 0x10ffff and allows the surrogate code
> points.

The November 2000 revision of GB 18030 removed the mappings to surrogate code points that had been previously assigned in the original (March 2000) version.

-Doug Ewell
 Fullerton, California

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Jul 20 2002 - 16:30:25 EDT