Re: REALLY *not* Tamil - changing scripts (long)

• Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: REALLY *not* Tamil - changing scripts (long)"
• In reply to: Jungshik Shin: "Re: REALLY *not* Tamil - changing scripts (long)"
• Next in thread: Curtis Clark: "Re: REALLY *not* Tamil - changing scripts (long)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 09:52:25PM -0400, Jungshik Shin wrote:
>
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, David Starner wrote:
>
> > At 08:46 PM 7/26/02 -0700, Addison Phillips [wM] wrote:
> > >That does leave you with the must less happy problem of finding a platform
> > >with user defined locales (approximately no platforms conveniently do this).
>
> > What's wrong with Linux's user defined locales? I attach one
>
> s/Linux/Single Unix Spec. compliant OS/ :-)

Nah, Linux is following ISO TR 14652, which is an enhancement of POSIX.
You cannot do 10646 support conveniently with SUS only.

Kind regards
Keld

• Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: REALLY *not* Tamil - changing scripts (long)"
• In reply to: Jungshik Shin: "Re: REALLY *not* Tamil - changing scripts (long)"
• Next in thread: Curtis Clark: "Re: REALLY *not* Tamil - changing scripts (long)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 16:32:48 EDT