Re: A new word for the English language

From: James Kass (jameskass@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Mon Aug 05 2002 - 11:04:14 EDT


Peter Constable wrote,

>
> That's about as good for me. In practice, I'd probably say "it is almost
> never necessary to encode a ligature glyph."
>

Come now, we don't encode glyphs, we encode characters.

Seriously, if there's one thing I've learned from this list, it is
that one should think twice before arguing with Mr. Constable.

Best regards,

James Kass.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 09:25:10 EDT