Re: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Fri Aug 30 2002 - 20:49:48 EDT

Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "RE: Double Macrons on "gh"..."
In reply to: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)"
Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michka is right. The "free font" vs "commercial font" argument comes
from the TYPO-L list, and probably isn't appropriate to this forum.

-- 
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com

Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "RE: Double Macrons on "gh"..."
In reply to: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)"
Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Romanized Cyrillic bibliographic data--viable fonts?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Aug 30 2002 - 21:30:07 EDT