Not sure how this could be generally possible to restrict, since
WinNT/2K/XP/.Net all will transparently map CF_TEXT an CF_UNICODETEXT so
that if one if put on the clipboard and the other is asked for, you will get
it. "Synthetic clipboard formats", etc...
MichKa
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Ewell" <dewell@adelphia.net>
To: <unicode@unicode.org>
Cc: <Peter_Constable@sil.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: Revised proposal for "Missing character" glyph
> I wrote:
>
> > It would make sense for a Unicode-specific tool such as this to only
> > accept data in WM_UNICHAR format, not WM_CHAR. Unicode data in
> > WM_CHAR format is pretty much guaranteed to have gone through some
> > conversion step.
>
> Well, duh. Of course I meant CF_UNICODETEXT and CF_TEXT, not WM_UNICHAR
> and WM_CHAR.
>
> -Doug Ewell
> Fullerton, California
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 01 2002 - 00:46:14 EDT