RE: Latin vowels?

From: Marco Cimarosti (marco.cimarosti@essetre.it)
Date: Tue Sep 10 2002 - 08:07:12 EDT


I wrote:
> Peter Constable wrote:
> > On 09/09/2002 02:43:52 AM Marco Cimarosti wrote:
> >
> > >1. List "Vowels" - probably not vowels:
> >
> > >U+212B # () ANGSTROM SIGN
> >
> > Given that this is canonically equivalent with a-ring, does
> > it make sense to consider one a vowel but the other not?
>
> I stand corrected.
>
> Somehow, I convinced myself that had canonical compatibility.
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Of course, what I wrongly convinced myself it had was: "compatibility
decomposition".

I shall be silent for a while, I guess.

_ Marco



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Sep 10 2002 - 09:19:53 EDT