From: Mark Davis (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Nov 01 2002 - 10:01:47 EST
If you (or anyone else) have an idea for a Q&A for the FAQ, just write it up
and submit it on http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reporting.html.
I see a great many promising Q&A's go by on this list; it would really help
to get some volunteers to clean them up a bit and submit them. (They don't
have to be formatted; just plain text in the style of any of the existing
► “Eppur si muove” ◄
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Cowan" <email@example.com>
To: "Thomas Lotze" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 05:59
Subject: Re: ct, fj and blackletter ligatures
> Thomas Lotze scripsit:
> > the alphabetic presentation forms starting at UFB00 contain a number of
> > ligatures for latin scripts, among them the more common ones like fi and
> > fl, but also rather exotic ones like st.
> Those exist basically for compatibility and round-tripping with
> character sets. Their use is discouraged. No more will be encoded.
> (FAQkeeper, this or something like it should go in the Unicode FAQ.
> The ligature_digraph page doesn't really address the question directly.)
> My corporate data's a mess! John Cowan
> It's all semi-structured, no less. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
> But I'll be carefree email@example.com
> Using XSLT
> In an XML DBMS.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 07:53:14 EST