From: Thomas Lotze (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Nov 02 2002 - 12:55:27 EST
On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 17:21:06 +0000
> This is possible because, other than the cmap
> (character-to-glyph mapping) table, all of the other tables in
> the font use a glyph index [...] internally.
> Such glyphs, since they can't be directly called, are only accessible
> via so-called "smart font" technology, like OpenType, AAT, and
How does this compare to unmapped glyphs in Type1 fonts, which can be
made accessible by re-encoding the font? Are they hidden at a deeper
level, or is it essentially the same thing? Do they get glyph names so a
program that can parse the font file can identify and use them even
though they are not mapped?
-- Thomas Lotze email@example.com http://www.thomas-lotze.de/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 13:22:39 EST