From: David Hopwood (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Nov 05 2002 - 12:36:23 EST
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
David Starner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 06:45:26PM +0100, Dominikus Scherkl wrote:
> > I found the arguments quite convincing - why deprecate the tags?
> > Noone has till now brought an argument to deprecate them...
> Because it's been a long standing discussion on this list. The argument
> against them is that they're stateful characters that many text
> processes will have to go to filter out (which, no matter how simple, is
> another complexity to already complex Unicode text processing),
There are plenty of other characters that need to be filtered by the same
processes. Deprecating plane 14 tags won't fix processes that need to
filter ignorable characters but that don't do so.
> that just plain won't be supported most places,
Why is this a problem that requires them to be deprecated?
> are totally pointless most places,
So don't use them where they are pointless.
> and where they aren't pointless, can and should be carried by a
> higher-level protocol.
This is not a strong enough argument to support deprecation, IMHO.
Note that if deprecation implies no longer treating these characters
as ignorables, then that causes new software that sees existing data using
plane 14 tags to break (to some extent; probably not fatally). OTOH, if
deprecation does not imply treating plane 14 tags as ignorables, then
nothing is gained: the complexity of filtering is still there, but the
characters can't actually be used.
David Hopwood <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/
RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5 0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01
Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a
public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been
seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 15:55:42 EST