Re: A .notdef glyph

From: John Cowan (
Date: Thu Nov 07 2002 - 16:53:52 EST

  • Next message: Thomas Chan: "Re: A .notdef glyph"

    John Hudson scripsit:

    > The dot's vertical position is tricky. If I centre it geometrically on the
    > height of the black rectangle, it looks too low because of the increased
    > black area above caused by the connection of the rectangle to the stem of
    > the hook. So I've raised it slightly. If you concentrate on the dot, it
    > looks too high, but if you stand back and look at the whole glyph, it looks
    > about right, or even a touch too low.

    When I do that, it looks like the dot is *part* of the question mark rather
    than being set off from it. There may be nothing to do about this.

    John Cowan
    To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all.  There are
    no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language that
    they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful. --The Hobbit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 17:34:24 EST