From: Frank da Cruz (fdc@columbia.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 18 2002 - 10:36:14 EST
> As a result of being monofont plain text viewers/editors are also notorious
> for not supporting much beyond a limited repertoire of characters [a few
> noble exceptions to this rule notwithstanding].
>
> Unless a widely used plain-text protocol requires or supports these
> characters, they remain a solution in search of a problem. I still haven't
> seen evidence of such a protocol.
>
We're doing our best. Kermit software supports Unicode in plain text
terminal sessions:
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/glass.html
and Linux is moving in that direction too (e.g. the Linux console in the
latest Red Hat release, as well as many Linux / GNU plain-text utilities,
now including EMACS 21.1):
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html
Plain-text interactive shell and application access is still a widely
used protocol, and is becoming more internationalized every day thanks to
Unicode.
- Frank
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 18 2002 - 12:20:28 EST