Re: CJK fonts

From: Raymond Mercier (RaymondM@compuserve.com)
Date: Wed Dec 11 2002 - 13:38:24 EST

Next message: Houman Pournasseh: "RE: Farsi Keheh +06A9 vs. Arabic Kaf +0643 ??"

Previous message: Raymond Mercier: "Re: CJK fonts"
In reply to: John H. Jenkins: "Re: CJK fonts"
Next in thread: Mark Davis: "Pinyin Readings (was Re: CJK fonts)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 09:04 AM 12/11/2002 -0700, you wrote:

>On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 08:27 AM, Raymond Mercier wrote:
>
>>For example, the simplified form of the character Han itself (U+6C49) is
>>given the Pinyin reading Yi, the traditional form U+6F22 is the correct
>>reading Han.
>
>Have you reported this?

Not yet, since I have only just noticed it. I know there is an address on
the Unicode site for such reporting.
Andrew West in a recent message mentioned a number of serious mis-readings.
These are the tip of the iceberg. The file needs a total overhaul.

>BTW, there's the official Unihan lookup Web page at
><http://www.unicode.org/charts/unihan.html>.
>
>==========
>John H. Jenkins
>jenkins@apple.com
>jhjenkins@mac.com
>http://www.tejat.net/
>

Next message: Houman Pournasseh: "RE: Farsi Keheh +06A9 vs. Arabic Kaf +0643 ??"
Previous message: Raymond Mercier: "Re: CJK fonts"
In reply to: John H. Jenkins: "Re: CJK fonts"
Next in thread: Mark Davis: "Pinyin Readings (was Re: CJK fonts)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 11 2002 - 14:20:36 EST