Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!!

From: Kevin Brown (
Date: Tue Dec 31 2002 - 20:18:16 EST

  • Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!!"


    >This new AGL simply looks like an error to me. It contains all Adobe's
    >in-house production names in addition to the names used for final font
    >files. I believe it is possible that someone at Adobe compiled the wrong

    By "contains all Adobe's in-house production names" do you mean the
    glyphs U+F6BD - U+F8FE? If so, these were in AGL 1.2 (Oct 98) as well.
    >I am not aware of anything in Adobe software that favours AGL names above
    >uniXXXX names. It is perfectly safe to ignore the AGL completely, even for
    >basic Latin characters if you so choose.

    I had heard that there could be a potential for problems with Acrobat
    when distilling with fonts which had uniXXXX names for glyphs for which
    AGL names existed?

                     Kevin Brown's G R A P H I T Y !
        147 Magill Road, Stepney S.A. AUSTRALIA 5069
                  Phone/Fax: +61 (0)8 8362 8664

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 20:52:33 EST