From: Kevin Brown (graphity@adelaide.on.net)
Date: Tue Dec 31 2002 - 20:18:16 EST
John
>This new AGL simply looks like an error to me. It contains all Adobe's
>in-house production names in addition to the names used for final font
>files. I believe it is possible that someone at Adobe compiled the wrong
>list.
By "contains all Adobe's in-house production names" do you mean the
glyphs U+F6BD - U+F8FE? If so, these were in AGL 1.2 (Oct 98) as well.
>
>I am not aware of anything in Adobe software that favours AGL names above
>uniXXXX names. It is perfectly safe to ignore the AGL completely, even for
>basic Latin characters if you so choose.
I had heard that there could be a potential for problems with Acrobat
when distilling with fonts which had uniXXXX names for glyphs for which
AGL names existed?
*****************************************
Kevin Brown's G R A P H I T Y !
DIGITAL TYPE SPECIALIST * GRAPHIC DESIGN
147 Magill Road, Stepney S.A. AUSTRALIA 5069
Phone/Fax: +61 (0)8 8362 8664
Email: graphity@adelaide.on.net
Est.1979
*****************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 20:52:33 EST