Re: A case for Tamil-X (k sh)

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (
Date: Wed Jan 08 2003 - 14:33:05 EST

  • Next message: Avarangal: "Re: A case for Tamil-X (k sh)"

    Hello all,

    This was sent out while the requirement was still be discussed elsewhere. In the not too distant
    future, one of two things will happen:

    A) a character proposal will be submitted, with the right form filled out and with samples of usage
    and justification, or

    B) nothing will be done, if it is determined that this character is not required.


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Michael Everson" <>
    To: <>
    Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:50 AM
    Subject: Re: A case for Tamil-X (k sh)

    > At 08:40 -0800 2003-01-08, Doug Ewell wrote:
    > >Sinnathurai Srivas <avarangal at hotmail dot com> wrote:
    > >There may be merit in adding this new "x" character (or perhaps the
    > >problem could be solved with ZWNJ or ZWJ), but Michael is correct:
    > >although it's a good idea to discuss it on the list first, nothing will
    > >be considered for addition unless a proper proposal is written and
    > >submitted.
    > It can't be discussed without seeing the glyphs. So far it is just English!
    > --
    > Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 08 2003 - 15:40:35 EST