Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'

From: Werner LEMBERG (
Date: Fri Feb 21 2003 - 01:26:41 EST

  • Next message: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'"

    > To give just one very widely available example Times New Roman has
    > always used the post 3.0 glyph.

    Right, but version 2.76 of times.ttf which comes with WinME doesn't
    contain a glyph for U+03D5 at all. And symbol.ttf version 1.60 uses
    the pre-3.0 glyph shapes.

    Show me a widely used font which contains both U+03C6 and U+03D5.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Feb 21 2003 - 02:31:11 EST