Re: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review

From: Yung-Fong Tang (ftang@netscape.com)
Date: Thu Feb 27 2003 - 14:59:51 EST

Next message: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review"

Previous message: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review"
Maybe in reply to: Asmus Freytag: "Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review"
Next in thread: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>>
>> This discussion has been centered around UTF-8. But I hope the
>>corresponding rules apply to UTF-16 and UTF-32 for Unicode 4.0:
>>
>>. for UTF-32: occurrences of 'surrogates' are ill-formed.
>>
>>
>>
How about UTF-32 sequence which the 4 bytes represent value > U+10FFFF ?
Are they considered ill-formed? Should they?

Next message: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review"
Previous message: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review"
Maybe in reply to: Asmus Freytag: "Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review"
Next in thread: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 27 2003 - 15:38:49 EST