From: Mijan (mijan@bangladesh.net)
Date: Wed Mar 05 2003 - 11:07:18 EST
Quoting Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>:
> At 16:48 -0500 2003-03-03, John Cowan wrote:
> >Mijan scripsit:
> >
> >> Let's consider the ra+virama+ya case. In the mostpart the ra+virama+ya
> is
> >> displayed as ya+reph. This obviously seems to be an
> >> instance of ambiguous interpretation because ra+virama+ya could
> >>also represents
> >> ra+ja-phalaa. ya+reph and ra+ja-phalaa are used in different words and
> have
> >> different meaning.
> >
> >I'm responding to this message in order to isolate this point. If
> >correct, then
> >the current model of YA PHALAA is inadequate.
>
> ZWJ can be used to produce the required differentiation.
I looked at Unicode Standard for meaning of ZWJ. I did not understand how can
ZWJ be used for Reph or Ya-phalaa?
Mijan
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through http://www.bangladesh.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 05 2003 - 12:07:25 EST