From: Andrew C. West (andrewcwest@alumni.princeton.edu)
Date: Mon Mar 10 2003 - 04:57:33 EST
"Doug Ewell" wrote:
> I suspect it would end when you start talking about combinations like qj
> and fþ that are unlikely to appear in natural language text.
You should know better than to make rash statements like this on the Unicode
list !
I don't know about qj, but fþ is a not uncommon combination in Old English, e.g.
hæfþ (3rd person singular of the verb habban "to have").
Andrew
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:34:20 EST