From: John H. Jenkins (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:42:38 EST
I certainly think it would be good published with a leather cover,
onion-skin paper, and gilt edges, yes. First we have to have Ken
divide it into verses, though.
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 01:19 PM, Yung-Fong Tang wrote:
> Hope they can reduce the weight next time by change the type of the
> paper. My Bible is about 500 pages (about 1500+ pages) more than the
> unicode 3.0 standard but only 50% of it's thick. Same as my
> Chinese/English dictionary.
> Otto Stolz wrote:
>> Kenneth Whistler wrote:
>>> we can
>>> calculate the weight as being *approximately* 9.05 pounds
>>> (avoirdupois) [or 10.99 troy pounds].
>> Apparently a weighty publication, that forthcoming Unicode standard...
>> Otto Stolz
John H. Jenkins
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:24:16 EST