Progressing genealogical symbols

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Fri Mar 14 2003 - 05:01:23 EST

  • Next message: askq1 askq1: "Re: Need encoding conversion routines"

    At 10:01 +0100 2003-03-14, Otto Stolz wrote:
    >>Dominikus Scherkl had written:
    >>Has anybody meanwhile contributed a proposal regarding the missing
    >>genealogical symbols? (after Otto Stolz's message from 24.02.2003 I
    >>wondered this was not proposed long ago - or was it and was
    >>rejected for some reason?!?).
    >So do I -- however, I am not in the position to author a formal
    >proposition: I am not able to provide a font, and I do not have the
    >time for a research beyond the evidence I have already given.

    Perhaps you would consider making a donation to the Script Encoding Initiative.

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 14 2003 - 05:39:28 EST