Progressing genealogical symbols

• Previous message: c.t.m. jacobs: "Re: Tolkien wanta-be has created entirely new language"
• In reply to: Otto Stolz: "Re: New document."
• Next in thread: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: New document."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 10:01 +0100 2003-03-14, Otto Stolz wrote:
>>Dominikus Scherkl had written:
>>Has anybody meanwhile contributed a proposal regarding the missing
>>genealogical symbols? (after Otto Stolz's message from 24.02.2003 I
>>wondered this was not proposed long ago - or was it and was
>>rejected for some reason?!?).
>
>So do I -- however, I am not in the position to author a formal
>proposition: I am not able to provide a font, and I do not have the
>time for a research beyond the evidence I have already given.

Perhaps you would consider making a donation to the Script Encoding Initiative.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

• Next message: askq1 askq1: "Re: Need encoding conversion routines"
• Previous message: c.t.m. jacobs: "Re: Tolkien wanta-be has created entirely new language"
• In reply to: Otto Stolz: "Re: New document."
• Next in thread: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: New document."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 14 2003 - 05:39:28 EST