Re: General punctuation spaces U+2000 to U+200B

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Sun Apr 27 2003 - 14:26:32 EDT

Next message: Kent Karlsson: "RE: Private Use Area"

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Unicode Normalization on MS-Windows"
In reply to: William Overington: "General punctuation spaces U+2000 to U+200B"
Next in thread: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: General punctuation spaces U+2000 to U+200B"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

William Overington <WOverington at ngo dot globalnet dot co dot uk>
wrote:

> I have been looking at U40-2000.pdf and ch06.pdf and now write to ask
> for advice in the matter please.
>
> What is the difference between U+2000 EN QUAD and U+2002 EN SPACE
> please?
>
> What is the difference between U+2001 EM QUAD and U+2003 EM SPACE
> please?

U+2000 and U+2001 are canonical equivalents of U+2002 and U+2003,
respectively. From a font-designing (glyph) standpoint, you can
consider the two pairs identical.

-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: Kent Karlsson: "RE: Private Use Area"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Unicode Normalization on MS-Windows"
In reply to: William Overington: "General punctuation spaces U+2000 to U+200B"
Next in thread: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: General punctuation spaces U+2000 to U+200B"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 27 2003 - 15:22:10 EDT