RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp"

From: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com
Date: Thu May 08 2003 - 09:27:49 EDT

Next message: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compat ibility decomp""

Previous message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Maybe in reply to: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Reply: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> I suppose there is always Bytext?

Hey, I was trying to be serious...

>
>

Next message: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compat ibility decomp""
Previous message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Maybe in reply to: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Reply: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 08 2003 - 10:22:53 EDT