From: Stefan Persson (email@example.com)
Date: Fri May 16 2003 - 14:24:35 EDT
Peter underscore Constable at sil dot org wrote:
> These might be considered encoding forms, and they might be able to encode
> the Unicode coded character set, but I don't think these should be called
> "Unicode encoding forms". There are exactly three Unicode encoding forms:
> UTF-8, UTF-16 and UTF-32.
Are not BE and LE regarded as different encoding forms, making five
encoding forms (UTF-8, UTF-16BE, UTF-16LE, UTF-32BE & UTF-32LE)?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 16 2003 - 15:13:18 EDT