From: Dominikus Scherkl (Dominikus.Scherkl@glueckkanja.com)
Date: Fri May 23 2003 - 10:52:22 EDT
> Proposal to encode symbols for genealogy and gender studies in the UCS
> There has been no comment which leads one to believe that there is
> nothing controversial in the set. :-)
From the character-encoding point of view, there isn't.
It's simply perfect - all that was missing (and more).
To something completely different:
While looking over TR#25 it mentions that the old german currency sign
for "Mark" was unified with the script M, but it is not mentioned in
the introduction to the code chart's currency symbols block.
Was this introduction intended to be exhaustive (so the unified Mark
symbol was simply forgotten) or are those only examples, and there are
still more currency symbols spread throughout the charts?
-- Dominikus Scherkl email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 23 2003 - 11:50:47 EDT