From: Pim Blokland (email@example.com)
Date: Tue May 27 2003 - 09:48:50 EDT
Doug Ewell schreef:
> > My feelings at this moment are that if you do want to make the
> > difference clear, write U+0133 for the "normal" ĳ sound and i+j
> (..) we should NOT be encouraging the use of the U+0132 and
> U+0133 for new text.
Yes, I do realize that. My answer was in response to the question on
how to distinguish the two cases; however I may not have got the
intonation right; the stress should have been on the "If you want to
make the difference clear" part. Because that's what I was trying to
get across: if the difference must be emphasised.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 27 2003 - 10:45:57 EDT