From: Edward H Trager (email@example.com)
Date: Thu May 29 2003 - 10:54:49 EDT
On Wed, 28 May 2003, John Hudson wrote:
> At 08:32 PM 5/28/2003, John Cowan wrote:
> >Netscape 4.x is dead.
> I wish it were. Monitoring the web traffic at one of the sites I'm involved
> with, I am dismayed to see that more than 5% of visitors are using Netscape
You should not be dismayed. We have a web application for
providing interactive data manipulation on the client side. In my tests,
some cases *much* more slowly. These tests covered Mac, Windows, and
Linux platforms. Slow performance is obnoxious, so we
recommend Netscape 4.x for that application since it showed the best
performance across different platforms in our heterogenous environment.
We could have gone with client-side Java, but the reality is that we would then risk having even
*slower* performance. Lots of organizations may have reasons like these
for sticking with older, arguably obsolete software like Netscape 4.x.
With regard to Unicode/UTF-8 support, a legacy program like
Netscape 4.x naturally has limitations.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 29 2003 - 11:37:46 EDT