RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)

Date: Fri May 30 2003 - 03:52:34 EDT

  • Next message: "RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)"

    > 2. It is unikely that the Unicode *logo* itself (i.e. the thing at
    > will be incorporated
    > directly in any image that people are allowed to put on their
    > websites,
    > because to put the Unicode logo on a product or whatever requires a
    > license agreement. I.e. the submissions from E. Trager are
    > out of scope
    > because they contain the Unicode logo on the left side.

    If the goal really is to follow the use of the W3C validation logos--
    those validation logos do include the readily recognizable W3C logo.
    This probably means that W3C made the conscious decision to allow
    the use of their logo for that particular purpose.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 30 2003 - 04:32:29 EDT