Re: Revised N2586R

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Thu Jun 26 2003 - 14:04:10 EDT

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Revised N2586R"

    At 13:03 +0100 2003-06-26, William Overington wrote:

    >Well, certainly authority would be needed, yet I am suggesting that where a
    >few characters added into an established block are accepted, which is what
    >is claimed for these characters, there should be a faster route than having
    >to wait for bulk release in Unicode 4.1.

    No, there shouldn't. The process will not be changed. Unicode and
    ISO/IEC 10646 are synchronized, and JTC1 ballotting processes are
    what they are. No further discussion is necessary, as it is pointless.

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 26 2003 - 14:58:24 EDT