From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jun 26 2003 - 14:04:10 EDT
At 13:03 +0100 2003-06-26, William Overington wrote:
>Well, certainly authority would be needed, yet I am suggesting that where a
>few characters added into an established block are accepted, which is what
>is claimed for these characters, there should be a faster route than having
>to wait for bulk release in Unicode 4.1.
No, there shouldn't. The process will not be changed. Unicode and
ISO/IEC 10646 are synchronized, and JTC1 ballotting processes are
what they are. No further discussion is necessary, as it is pointless.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 26 2003 - 14:58:24 EDT