From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jun 26 2003 - 16:36:51 EDT
At 13:23 -0700 2003-06-26, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
>Not only is the name likely to change (based on all the issues
>already discussed), but it is conceivable that WG2 could decide to
>approve it at some other code position instead.
Indeed I will probably propose to move the character on general
principles. ;-) No cheating! ;-)
>It is even conceivable that WG2 could *refuse* to encode the character.
(I shouldn't think so.)
>There have been precedents, where a UTC approved character met
>opposition in WG2, and the UTC later decided to rescind its approval
>in favor of maintaining
>synchronization of the standards when published.
And vice versa.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 26 2003 - 17:22:18 EDT