From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Jun 27 2003 - 05:59:04 EDT
At 04:22 -0500 2003-06-27, Peter_Constable@sil.org wrote:
>Are we saying that ISO doesn't give a rip for implementation issues?
Duplication of characters is not the way to fix (forgive me, UTC)
*Unicode's* error in combining characters.
>Or that their notion of ordering distinctions is different from
>Unicode's such that *any* differently ordering permutation of some
>given set of characters is considered a distinct representation?
>Are we saying that the voting members of WG2 are not already aware
>of the issue that has been discussed and incapable of understanding
>an explanation of these issues addressed to them?
You might submit your paper to WG2.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 27 2003 - 06:56:06 EDT