Re: Biblical Hebrew

From: Karljürgen Feuerherm (cuneiform@rogers.com)
Date: Fri Jun 27 2003 - 14:07:16 EDT

  • Next message: Karljrgen Feuerherm: "Fw: Biblical Hebrew (Was: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels)"

    Jony Rosenne said on June 27, 2003 at 2:17 PM

    > > 1. Everyone is more or less agreed that the present combining
    > > class rules as they apply to BH contain mistakes.
    >
    > I don't. I do agree that are some cases that are not handled.

    Well, ok, 'omissions,' then. If BH was intended to be covered in the first
    place then that is still a mistake of sorts.

    But I take your point. This was why I added the postscript at a certain
    point about not breaking MH in the process.

    K

    K



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 27 2003 - 14:41:07 EDT