Re: Biblical Hebrew (Was: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels)

From: Karljürgen Feuerherm (cuneiform@rogers.com)
Date: Fri Jun 27 2003 - 14:13:03 EDT

  • Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Biblical Hebrew (Was: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels)"

    Peter replied:

    > Karljürgen Feuerherm wrote on 06/27/2003 08:23:08 AM:
    >
    > > Now, Q: I take it the combining classes are linked to the script, rather
    > > than say to a dialect
    >
    > They're linked to the character.

    > > --e.g. one can't define BH as a separate dialect from
    > > MH with its own set of rules?
    >
    > No, not unless BH is encoded with a separate set of characters.

    I see. Not desirable, to say the least.

    Thanks

    K

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 27 2003 - 14:46:59 EDT