From: Pim Blokland (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Jun 30 2003 - 07:58:14 EDT
Philippe Verdy schreef:
> Interesting issue for the Latin Small "ij" Ligature (U+0133):
> Normally the Soft_Dotted issupposed to make disappear one dot when
> there's and additional diacritic above, but many applications may
> keep these two dots above, fitting the diacritic in the middle.
> This proposal would mean that this become illegal, and it promote
> use of an additional intermediate dot-above diacritic if the dot
> be kept.
I don't know of any instances where a ij digraph would keep the dots
AND get additional accent marks, nor of any where the ij would
appear with a dotless i and dotless j and a single dot above,
centered between them. Can you give examples?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 30 2003 - 08:45:40 EDT