RE: UTF-8 to UTF-16LE

From: Francois Yergeau (FYergeau@alis.com)
Date: Tue Jul 08 2003 - 10:40:55 EDT

Next message: Francois Yergeau: "RE: French group separators, was Re: The character for 10**24 i nJapanesenumbers (jo)"

Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: UTF-8 to UTF-16LE"
Maybe in reply to: santhosh kumar: "UTF-8 to UTF-16LE"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: UTF-8 to UTF-16LE"
Reply: John Cowan: "Re: UTF-8 to UTF-16LE"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

John Cowan wrote:
> (Bogusly IMHO, an HTTP Content-Type: header overrides this rule.)

There seems to be more and more agreement against this bogosity. Perhaps
more than idle chatter is in order, but I'm not sure where to start...

-- 
François Yergeau

Next message: Francois Yergeau: "RE: French group separators, was Re: The character for 10**24 i nJapanesenumbers (jo)"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: UTF-8 to UTF-16LE"
Maybe in reply to: santhosh kumar: "UTF-8 to UTF-16LE"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: UTF-8 to UTF-16LE"
Reply: John Cowan: "Re: UTF-8 to UTF-16LE"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 08 2003 - 11:19:06 EDT