From: Peter Kirk (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Jul 08 2003 - 14:21:32 EDT
On 08/07/2003 11:10, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>Admit that your proposal of using a canonical decomposition would
>still cause problems with all Unicode algorithms, and with XML
>Only a NFKD decomposition would make your proposed "ligature"
>character workable for XML processing and Unicode algorithms,
>including UCA, case mappings, UTF representations, etc...
This proposal for a compatibility decomposition is a possible
alternative, but it's not my proposal, it's yours. I was deliberately
avoiding anything like this which is not compatible with existing texts.
If canonical decomposition isn't going to work, which I'm still not 100%
sure of if composition is blocked, then I will withdraw my proposal.
-- Peter Kirk firstname.lastname@example.org http://web.onetel.net.uk/~peterkirk/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 08 2003 - 15:05:20 EDT