Re: Later emendations to cuneiform encoding

From: Karljürgen Feuerherm (cuneiform@rogers.com)
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:30:25 EDT

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Back to Hebrew, was OT:darn'd fools"

    Don't worry. I'm not looking for more work.

    I just think it is worth going into this eyes open, and the recent BH
    discussions have made me aware of how little I actually understood what I
    thought I did.

    A gramme of caution now is worth a tonne of cure later.... (in 'most
    progressive nation of the earth' language) ;)

    K
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Michael Everson" <everson@evertype.com>
    To: "Cuneiform Discussion" <cuneiform@unicode.org>
    Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 1:26 PM
    Subject: Re: Later emendations to cuneiform encoding

    > You'd make a choice at the time, on a case-by-case basis.
    >
    > Please, just do the work you've already agreed to do, namely, a
    > maximally-decomposed set that we can actually discuss.
    > --
    > Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 29 2003 - 14:12:42 EDT