Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Wed Jul 30 2003 - 17:45:53 EDT

  • Next message: "Re: Back to Hebrew -holem-waw vs waw-holem"

    At 16:50 -0400 2003-07-30, John Cowan wrote:
    >Michael Everson scripsit:
    >> >See the reference glyph for U+FB4B. One form looks like this with
    >> >the dot above further to the left, the other like it with the dot a
    >> >little further to the right. This glyph with the centred dot is a
    >> >compromise between the two.
    >> A picture speaks a thousand words.
    >These particular words combined with the picture in the U3.0 chart tell all.

    I see. This disunification tempts. I'd go to the bother of writing up
    the proposal for adding this combining character if on further
    discussion it appears the right thing to do.

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 30 2003 - 18:32:06 EDT