From: Peter Kirk (peter.r.kirk@ntlworld.com)
Date: Fri Aug 08 2003 - 17:00:07 EDT
On 08/08/2003 13:56, Thomas M. Widmann wrote:
>Peter Kirk <peter.r.kirk@ntlworld.com> writes:
>
>
>
>>On 08/08/2003 08:54, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>... Could there be another codepoint assigned that has
>>>
>>>these properties:
>>>
>>>20CF;ZERO WIDTH SYMBOL;Sk;0;ON;<compat> 0020;;;;N;;;;;
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>
>>But I'm not sure that ZERO WIDTH SYMBOL is the best name, unless you
>>are suggesting other uses in which it really has zero width. Well, it
>>might have in a case like line initial holam which shifts on to a
>>following silent alef, but that is a rather special case.
>>
>>
>
>What would be a better name? ACCENT CARRIER?
>
>/Thomas
>
>
Perhaps CARRIER FOR COMBINING CHARACTERS - not COMBINING CHARACTER
CARRIER as that gives the wrong idea that this should itself be a
combining character, it should not.
-- Peter Kirk peter@qaya.org (personal) peterkirk@qaya.org (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 08 2003 - 17:52:27 EDT