From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 2003 - 11:39:45 EDT
Peter Kirk <peter dot r dot kirk at ntlworld dot com> wrote:
> Thank you, Ken. Well, you make it sound as if the problems are
> minimal, and that version I can just about accept. But if Philippe is
> correct about what he says about UAX#29 and UAX#14, there are some
> more serious problems. It is certainly highly inappropriate for
> non-spacing diacritics to be considered word boundaries.
Non-spacing diacritics had better not be word boundaries, otherwise a
string like Québec (spelled with U+0301, as here) would be considered
two words. I don't have time right now to look up the relevant
properties and UAX's, but I sincerely hope this is just another
"Philippe mistake" and not a general misinterpretation that anyone might
make.
-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 11 2003 - 12:32:16 EDT